This 10 point guide to CRE appraisals will help you understand how commercial appraisers establish the scope of work and the appraisal methods used to arrive at a value estimate. With this CRE knowledge and insight, you will understand the commercial appraisal process and what kind of appraisal is appropriate for your circumstances as well as how to make the process more efficient by knowing what data the appraiser needs to complete the appraisal.
You will learn:
A commercial real estate appraisal value may be critical to important decisions that carry risk factors, like a mortgage with a high loan to value ratio, or it may be a low risk matter of routine due diligence required for compliance by private or governmental organizations.
Most commercial appraisals are ordered for banking related activities, but there are many more activities where commercial property appraisal is central to important asset management decisions.
The first order of business for an appraiser is to establish the appraisal problem to be solved. Think of this as understanding the context of the appraisal: Why is the appraisal being ordered? Who is ordering the appraisal? How will it be used? Who will read and make decisions based on the appraisal?
Answering these questions guides the appraiser in determining his or her competence for the appraisal problem, the level of research and analyses required and how much detail to include in the report for the client.
Defining the problem is key for the appraiser to provide a quote for appraisal services.
The appraiser has a duty to provide services that are not inadequate for the appraisal problem or produce a misleading report. For example, a client requests a ‘drive-by’ appraisal on a complex income property with incomplete financial information. In most cases this can only be done with prominent and clear disclosures and assumptions informing the client of the limitations of the appraisal and associated risks. Unless there are extenuating circumstances, most appraisers would decline such an assignment.
The appraiser must provide a level of competency, research, due diligence and analysis that is adequate for the scope of the appraisal.
There are 13 major property types and literally hundreds of sub-types. Most commercial appraisers develop and maintain a competency around common property types within their market area. Competency includes market area knowledge and competency for a given property type in one market does not guarantee competency in a different market area.
Appraiser competency is far reaching and truly requires deep knowledge of the property type and market area.
For an income property appraisal, for example, the appraiser is required to thoroughly understand the subject and competitive market rental rates for all of the space types within the subject property, as well as market vacancy rates, each individual expense, overall expense ratios and capitalization rates. But it doesn't end there, the appraiser should understand the typical buyer profile and motivation, as well as typical marketing times for the market area.
In short, the appraiser must know how to handle the appraisal problem and know the market.
When a commercial appraiser is engaged for an assignment, s/he has a fiduciary relationship with the client and a responsibility for maintaining confidentiality. This means subject property information disclosed during the appraisal that is not publicly available is considered confidential. The appraiser may only disclose the appraisal findings and report with the client.
The client may only use the appraisal for the intended purpose stated in the appraisal. For example, if a client requested an appraisal for mortgage financing, and then used the appraisal as documentation for a CRE tax appeal, the appraiser would have no responsibility or liability for this unauthorized use.
Appraisers create a ‘work file’ for every assignment. The work file contains all the data used in the appraisal process and must be retained for a period of five years, depending on state licensing requirements. Other conditions such as litigation can extend the data retention requirement. Work files are discoverable in legal matters.
The appraisal scope sets the framework for the level of research and appraisal valuation methods required. Sometimes the scope of work can be quite limited and require only one valuation method with a short report summarizing the assignment parameters, the subject property, valuation analysis and conclusion. This report might be as short as ~50 pages (you read that right, most CRE appraisal reports are longer). This type of short report is suitable for clients that know the market, subject property type and risk is low.
Other times the scope of work is exhaustive requiring a high level of research, application of all relevant valuation methodologies, a well reasoned and detailed rationale for the value conclusion, and a lengthy, detailed and technical appraisal report. This type of report can be thought of as a stand alone appraisal, containing all the information necessary for a reader to fully understand the market, subject property, valuation analyses and final conclusion.
Some examples that require varying levels of scope:
Scope of Work
Non complex. For example, a condominium office unit.
Mortgage underwriting for a 50% LTV loan.
Local lender that knows the market, neighborhood and has the subject property in it’s portfolio.
Minimal: A summary market analysis, summary property description and one approach to value.
Moderately complex. For example a multi-tenant office building.
Mortgage underwriting for a 80% LTV loan.
Local lender that knows the market, but not the neighborhood or property.
Moderate: A complete market analysis, property description and all applicable valuation methods.
Complex. For example a multi-tenant office building that will lose critical parking spaces through eminent domain for a new highway project.
Valuation of damages caused by loss of parking. May include litigation.
Property owner and representatives. Stated use of appraisal include litigation support.
Maximum: Complete, detailed market analyses, property description and all applicable valuation methods.
Scope of work for a commercial appraisal typically describes:
The appraiser’s inspection is very different from a professional Property Condition Assessment (PCA) inspection where building systems are tested and all or most of the property is thoroughly inspected.
The appraiser’s inspection is less intensive. For example, only representative areas are inspected and the balance of the unexpected areas are assumed to be commensurate with the areas viewed. Plumbing, electrical and other building systems are not tested by the appraiser, rather they are quantified and rated for the purpose of valuation analysis.
When available, these data include:
Commercial appraisal can be very dynamic. For example, an apartment complex might have a higher worth as a condominium complex. Residential properties close to business centers are often repurposed as offices, retail, restaurants and more recently to AirBnB. The demise of the mall and the rise of AirBnb are contemporary examples of real estate use change dynamics.
A vacant commercial land parcel may have an interim highest and best as a parking lot, or some other limited use until market conditions support development.
Interim uses are temporary and typically provide a means of generating some income until it is financially feasible to develop the property.
How does an appraiser determine the highest best use for commercial property? By answering the four tests of highest and best use:
CRE highest and best use analysis is often applied under two scenarios:
The two analyses may yield different results, often when the existing improvements are old or obsolete and it makes more sense to redevelop the site.
Appraisal methods are often called referenced as approaches to value. There are generally three CRE valuation methods/approaches:
Additionally there is the Development Method, which incorporates a combination of cost, sales and income methodologies. This is typically used for residential development, but also used for many non-residential developments where units are sold over time.
Other methods include statistical analysis, which today includes machine learning and other advanced technologies to evaluate a large population of properties. Real estate tax assessments are typically generated by statistical methods. These methods provide reliable values most of the time, but there is always a percentage of properties that don’t fit the model and have incorrect values.
Also called the Sales Comparison Approach, Market Approach or Sales Analysis.
The sales comparison method is based on market activity for similar properties in the subject’s competitive market area. The subject is compared with sales, contracts and listings of similar properties. Differences between the subject and comparables are identified and analyzed, resulting in an indication of value for the subject.
Sales Comparison Grid
Sales analysis is typically done using a sales comparison grid, where side-by-side comparisons can be viewed and a range of value is indicated for the subject property. With a range of values established, each comparable is analyzed for strength and weaknesses. The comparables that require the fewest adjustments are usually the most reliable indicators of value which ideally would bracket the subject’s value with a narrow range. The final step is to reconcile to a final value estimate.
Think of unit values as common denominators among a group of properties. These are valuation benchmarks that can readily be compared among properties.
Sales comparison valuation methodology is a sound approach to value when there are an adequate number of comparables and the approach reflects market behavior.
Things to consider when reviewing a CRE sales analysis:
This venn diagram shows the sweet spot of CRE comparable property selection.
The Income Capitalization method converts net income to value through a capitalization or discounting process. For income producing commercial real estate, this method is frequently used and relied on in the marketplace.
The income approach is arguably the most complicated CRE valuation method. Each step in the analysis builds on the previous step, so diligence is key to avoiding the cumulative effect of small errors.
As an example, a slightly high estimate of PGI, a slightly low estimate of vacancy and collection losses, followed by a slightly low estimate of expenses will produce an inflated NOI. Applying a slightly low capitalization rate will likely produce an inflated value. Yet the small individual errors that compounded to produce this result might not be apparent to the untrained eye.
Fortunately, commercial appraisers have several tools available to verify each step of the analysis.
Stabilized income is what the subject should generate to be inline with the market. Stabilized income is usually synonymous with stabilized occupancy. For example, if most properties in the competitive market area are running at 90 to 95% occupancy, we would expect the subject to be in this range.
When using the income capitalization method, stabilized income is used for the subject cash flow projection. This provides a value estimate for the subject“as stabilized” - a prospective future value. To get the current "as is" value an adjustment for lease-up expense is deducted from the“as stabilized”value.
Stabilization expenses include marketing and leasing commissions, potentially some level of fit up for new tenants, lost income, and additional expenses incurred from carrying extra vacant space.
Elements to consider when preparing or reviewing an income capitalization analysis.
Band of Investment
Mortgage Constant (Rm)
LTV (Loan to Value)
Weighed Lender Requirement
Equity Dividend Rate
Weighted Investor requirement
Debt Coverage Ratio Formula
Debt Coverage Ratio Method
Debt Coverage Ratio
Market Extracted Capitalization Rates
When NOI for a comparable property is known, market extracted cap rates can be calculated with this formula:
NOI / Price = Capitalization Rate
Critical to this formula is the development of NOI. Often, published comparable data includes NOI but not a breakdown of expenses used to determine NOI. Line item expenses will often vary from property to property and market to market and may include or exclude certain expenses items. When that happens, we are comparing apples to oranges.
For example, with smaller owner-managed properties, the management fee may be understated or overstated depending on the financial and tax goals of the owner-manager. Let’s say the owner-manager includes management at 3% of EGI, but typical management fees are in the range of 10% EGI. Let's look at the resulting cap rates:
$33,000 (33% of EGI)
Includes management at 3%
$40,000 (40% of EGI)
Includes management at 10%
That is close to a 12% difference in cap rates. Now let's look at the effect on value.
As you can see, a 12% difference in the cap rate translates directly to a 12% swing in value. If you are a lender making a 90% loan, that’s a problem!
This where a thorough analysis of expense ratios will reveal inconsistencies in the comparable data and prompt further investigation.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF)
DCF analysis is a more powerful version of the direct capitalization method. The process involves projecting the subject’s cash flow into the future, and proceeds from a future sale of the property, known as the reversion value. DCF cash flows are projected for the entire investment holding period, usually 5 to 10 years.
Annual future cash flows are converted to present value with a discount rate that reflects the investor’s required overall yield, commonly known as the Internal Rate of Return (IRR).
Cash Flow Source
NOI & Reversion
Cash Flow Amount
$56,275 & $835,000
Discount Rate @ 8%
Present Value of Cash Flow
$779,304, $780,000, rounded
The Power of DCF Analysis
DCF is often the go-to analysis for complex, institutional grade commercial real estate. With the ability to explicitly project cash flows based on the terms of each individual lease future cash flows can be articulated with precision.
DCF is also a great tool for income properties that require a period of time to achieve stabilized cash flow.
The Risk of DCF Analysis
As with Direct Capitalization, the risk of compounding errors is always present, but with DCF the risk is amplified.
CRE Valuation Multipliers
Valuation multipliers rely on hgh level financial data and therefore can be easily applied. For some property types and markets, multipliers are well defined and frequently used by market participants. We will review the most common multipliers used by CRE analysts.
PGIM formula: Price / Potential Gross Income = PGIM
EGIM formula: Price / Effective Gross Income = EGIM
PGI x PGIM = Value
EGI x EGIM = Value
Valuation multipliers are a handy method for quick analyses and as tests of reasonableness for other valuation methods. However, all methods have strengths and weaknesses; multipliers require highly similar property types and expense ratios.
Why are Expense Ratios Important for the Multiplier Valuation Method?
Expense ratios affect NOI and therefore value. The following example illustrates why this is important.
Note that as expense ratios go down, value goes up. In the example above EGI remains constant at $90,000, while prices increase as a buyer will justifiable pay more for a higher NOI as they can still earn the desired 6% rate of return.
Without knowledge of comparable expense ratios, an analyst could understandably select a multiplier from the middle of the range (~9.2), but this is weighted by comparables with lower expense ratios and higher NOIs comparable to the subject and overstates the subject’s value.
Subject EGIM Analysis
$90,000 x 9.2 = $825,000
Now consider the implied cap rate for the subject: $40,500 / $825,000 = 4.9%
The implied cap rate is 4.9%, much lower (18%) than the 6% rate required by market participants. This reveals the subject has been overvalued and wont produce the market requirement of a 6% return. Capitalizing the subject’s NOI at 6% indicates a value of $745,000, $80,000 less than the inflated EGIM analysis.
The bottom line here is that multipliers can easily be skewed by expense ratios and when possible should be checked for reasonableness against other approaches.
+ Land Value
The Cost approach has its place in commercial real estate valuation, but it’s role is limited for a few reasons:
The cost approach should set the upper limit of value before depreciation is applied.
There are valuation problems where the Cost Approach is the only valuation method available, despite its limitations. For example:
The final reconciliation process takes a hard look at each approach applied. The CRE appraiser considers the quantity and quality of data applied for each valuation method, and how closely the approach reflects buyer behavior in the market; does the valuation method reflect how a typical buyer would value the property?
A robust sales analysis includes at least three to five recent, proximate and similar sales that require minimal adjustments to bring them to parity with the subject. Note that adding more sales to the analysis does not necessarily improve the reliability of the analysis if they are poor quality comparables.
Chances are if you have three to five recent, proximate and similar sales, this approach will reflect buyer behavior.
Where income analyses have many inputs, there are more tests of reasonableness to consider.
The cost approach reconciliation considers:
Finally, how well does each approach buyer behavior? If a typical buyer places emphasis on income analysis, the appraiser should too. Likewise, if a typical buyer places emphasis on comparable sales, such as with single tenant owner-occupied properties, the sales analysis should be as robust as possible, with secondary emphasis given to additional approaches.
Of course, there are times when there is inadequate data for preferred approach. In cases like this, it may be appropriate to give weight to an otherwise secondary approach/methodologies.
A Note About Averaging
Averaging value indications from different approaches is generally frowned upon in the valuation profession as different approaches rarely deserve equal weight (though it is possible). Typically, the appraiser will more closely align the value conclusion with the approach that is most reliable and best reflects buyer behavior.